CIAA is esstablished as constitutional organ to check corruption but corruption is still increasing day by day instead of decreasing. why?​

Suppose that a flower nursery benefits from having a butterfly farm located only a few miles away, because the presence of the insects greatly improves flower pollination. lawyers for the two companies meet to draft a legal document specifying the number of butterflies the farm promises to maintain in exchange for payments to be made by the nursery. which of the following types of private solutions to the externality of pollination has occurred in this case? charities moral codes and social sanctions integration of different types of businesses contracts it’s important to note that sometimes private solutions to externalities do not work. for example, this occurs when communications barriers or social customs are important enough relative to the potential gains involved that (a) the government must step in (b) the private solution is not feasible (c) the market system has a crisis

U. s. history i which statement is true? the missouri compromise ended slavery in the south. the compromise of 1850 eliminated slavery only in the south. the missouri compromise postponed the issue of slavery. the compromise of 1850 ended slavery in every region of the united states.

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?