Thought that the tao was a blind physical force which produced the world not by design or will but necessity or chance

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you forgot to ask a question, There is no question here, just a statement

What is your question? What do you want to know?

However, trying to help you we can comment on the following.

Reading your statement, we can assume that you are talking about Yang Chu, one of the Chinese teachers that studied Taoism and interpret it as "Tao was a blind physical force which produced the world, not by design or will but necessity or chance."

Scholars and historians considered that this approach to Tao is a hedonistic perspective of Taoism, even seen as a materialistic perspective of Tao.

Taoism supports the balance between opposing forces.

Tao Te Ching, Laozi said: "The Way gives birth to the One. The One gives birth to two. Two give birth to three. All three give birth to all things. All beings support the yin and embrace the yang. And through the blending of qi (energy), they create harmony."

So Taoism refers to the correct balance of opposite forces to live in harmony: good and bad, black and white, fear and love.

One good example is the symbol of the Ying and the Yang, in which the black sign has a white dot and the white sign has a black dot. This is the perfect balance of energy in everything that exists.

i'll just take the points xd

sir frederic attributed inaccuracies to schemas. memory reconstruction is one part actual events and one part personal schema, which can result in inaccuracies when memories are reconstructed.