Suppose that a person, Mike, believes that in order for an entity, X, to have a right to life, X must have a desire to live. Suppose that another person, Don, believes that in order for an entity, X, to have a right to life, X must have a valuable future with experiences and activities like those of most adult human beings. What would be the most effective critique that Mike, utilizing his own theory, could state against Don's theory

Amanda reiss was injured at a wedding reception at a private home. amanda tripped over a piece of rebar that was sticking from the end of one portion of a sidewalk leading to the front door. amanda's lawyer believes that the homeowners were aware of the rebar problem and that other guests to the home had tripped over it but not been injured. how can amanda's lawyer get the information about the homeowner's knowledge? a. he cannot because they are not required to talk with amanda's lawyers b. he can depose the homeowners c. he can depose others who have been guests d. both b and c