HEY DO NOT SEARCH UP RO. BLOX TWI. TT. ER AND THEN GO TO IMAGE DO NOT DO IT

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Analyze the photo below and answer the question that follows. photo by perry quan what kind of service does the facility in the photo above provide, according to christaller's central place theory? a. low-order service b. high-order service c. low-growth service d. specialized-need service

I'm in a few lessons on eastern europe and i need me don't leave me hanging. : {