N support of the Thirteenth Amendment, President Lincoln argued that slavery did not impact the Civil War.
slavery should be made illegal everywhere.
slavery should be allowed in the South only.
slavery should be allowed in the North only.

The correct answer is B) slavery should be made illegal everywhere.

In support of the Thirteenth Amendment, President Lincoln argued that

slavery should be made illegal everywhere.

The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified by the necessary states on December 6, 1865. It abolished slavery in the US. From now on, slavery in the country only could be a form of punishment when someone committed a crime.

Unfortunately for Abraham Lincoln, he couldn't witness this important moment in the history of the US because he was assassinated on April 15, 1865.

When one reads the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution, you notice a loophole: "...except as a punishment for crime..."

This loophole has been used in the history of the United States to send people to jail and punish African Americans in periods of history such as the case of the Jim Crow legislation and the black codes in the southern states.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: