Recuerda el inicio de siglo XX se caracteriza por los importantes avances tecnológicos, que se
desarrollaron en diferentes partes del mundo; sin
embargo, para muchos historiadores, estos avan-
ces significaron el comienzo de la destrucción de
la humanidad.

1. Observa la fotografía y describe los avances
tecnológicos que se encuentran allí.
2. ¿Qué actividades están realizando las personas
que se encuentran en esta fotografía?
3. ¿En qué forma crees que los avances tecno-
lógicos de inicios del siglo XX destruyen a
la humanidad?
4. ¿Crees que las personas utilizaron adecuadamen-
te la tecnología al iniciar el siglo XX? ¿Por qué?
5. ¿Según esta afirmación los avances tecnológi-
cos no le sirven a la humanidad? Argumenta
tu respuesta.

​

Lester zygmanik was charged with murdering his brother, george after george was severely injured in a motorcycle accident. george did not want to live his life as a quadriplegic and asked lester to kill him; lester did as his brother asked. if you were a juror in this case and you were making decisions based on black letter law, you would decide that lester is

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u. s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.

The platt amendment of 1901 forbade cuba from entering into any treaties that would allow undue foreign involvement in cuban affairs. this law was passed after the spanish-american war to make sure that european nations weren’t going to get involved with cuba. 1, why might the platt amendment be considered ironic? 2, what reasons would the united states have for not wanting european influence in cuba?