Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00, Bhoom1871
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:30, loganlatimer2001
Which of the following was a result of the political debates over the whiskey rebellion?
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00, liyahhhbandz
Which of the following events most directly contributed to the establishment of israel as a nation
Answers: 2
I am bor ed any one wanna talk to me...
English, 25.09.2019 12:00
Mathematics, 25.09.2019 12:00
Mathematics, 25.09.2019 12:00
History, 25.09.2019 12:00