In your own words, present the defense for eating animals which claims that non- human animals are not sufficiently rational for moral consideration (rationality
separates humans from nonhuman animals). Then explain why Norcross thinks
that the existence of non-paradigm (marginal) humans shows that this response is
problematic

new ideas form the base for the growth of the people.each time they try to develop, they may discover a new form or abilities of themselves this makes the people satisfied in living their life in a happy way.this makes sense that new ideas of people cn change their live.the ideas, if bring their best, they will be changing their present state.