Answers: 3
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00, Bhoom1871
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30, kimjooin02
What specific words do you hear in dr. kingβs speech that are powerful
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:00, FireFlight
Ais a way of expressing the relationship of a number, quantity, substance, or degree between two components
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:50, haileybug0305
Which of the following is a primary reason why countries trade
Answers: 2
Any body need a friend : - )β...
History, 03.02.2020 16:46
Mathematics, 03.02.2020 16:46
Mathematics, 03.02.2020 16:46
History, 03.02.2020 16:46
Biology, 03.02.2020 16:46
Mathematics, 03.02.2020 16:46