Which of the following accurately compares civil liberties in authoritarian and democratic regimes?
Democratic regimes provide citizens access to state-controlled media, while
authoritarian regimes restrict citizen access to state-controlled media.
Authoritarian regimes limit citizen control of the media, while in democratic regimes
media is largely in the hands of private citizens.
Authoritarian regimes encourage privatization of the media to increase legitimacy,
while democratic regimes support some privatization along with state control.
While democratic and authoritarian regimes restrict access to free media,
authoritarian regimes have increasingly allowed access to the Internet to increase
legitimacy.

For each example, identify the most appropriate ctso. ann wants to be a manager who directs the work of others: hosadecatsanational ffa teresa wants to have a career that emphasizes mathematics: fcclapastsanyfea justin wants to have a career in nursing: bpahosafbla-pblfea howard wants to have a career focused on the education of others: feafcclanyfeapas

According to subpart d, research with children may be eligible for exemption when: the children will be asked to complete a surveythe research involves the use of educational teststhe children will be interviewed by the researcher. the research with children will involve participant observation with researcher interaction.

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.