Okay so your an Attorney, WRITE AN OPENING STATEMENT DEFENDING YOUR CLIENT. YOU MUST USE EVIDENCE FROM PREVIOUS SUPREME COURT CASES TO PROVE YOUR CLIENT'S CASE. Each argument must include your opinion, the violated civil liberty/civil right or constitutional right and at least one court case to help your argument.

Your client was arrested for having possession of a controlled substance. Police officers were given a tip that he was selling prescription drugs. While away from home your client’s roommate opened the door and agreed to answer questions. The police officers then went into your client’s room without a warrant or consent and found the prescription bottles under his mattress. What constitutional rights were violated and what court case could you use to get the evidence thrown out.

Voters commonly condemn politicians for being insincere, but politicians often must disguise their true feelings when they make public statements. if they expressed their honest views—about, say, their party's policies—then achieving politically necessary compromises would be much more difficult. clearly, the very insincerity that people decry shows that our government is functioning well. which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines this reasoning? (a) achieving political compromises is not all that is necessary for the proper functioning of a government. (b) some political compromises are not in the best long-term interest of the government. (c) voters often judge politicians by criteria other than the sincerity with which they express their views. (d) a political party's policies could turn out to be detrimental to the functioning of a government. (e) some of the public statements made by politicians about their party's policies could in fact be sincere.