Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, KittyLitty
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50, seannalove4148
Atreatment for stuttering in which the person is asked to speak in a singsong fashion, usually with the aid of a metronome is
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30, kimjooin02
What specific words do you hear in dr. kingβs speech that are powerful
Answers: 1
To whom did president ford offer partial amnesty?...
English, 05.05.2020 12:57
Social Studies, 05.05.2020 12:57
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 12:57