It is ethical to hold negative opinions about people. true or false

That statement is true

Everyone had a flaw, including ourselves. Everybody tend to be able to easily spot other people's flaw while failing to see our own. When we constantly become a person who point out the fault of others to everyone around us, people would started to doubt whether they can trust us in revealing their vulnerable weakness.

The correct answer is true.

It is ethical to hold negative opinions about people, as long as you express your opinion in front of that people, never at their backs, and never generate gossip or rumors about people. Everybody can have a negative opinion about other people or companies. Yo do not to agree all the time with them But you treat people with respect and say to them what you need to tell in front of them and respectfully explain your arguments.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.