Does abiding by the second amendment mean gun restrictions are illegal, or should the government limit civilian ownership of modern weapons that the founding fathers couldn’t imagine over 200 years ago?

I believe the lather that there should be gun restriction because modern weapons have become 100 times more accessible today than in the past. It is fundamental to understand that guns are not the problem itself but the power lies in the individual who can use that gun for dangerous, threatening reasons. So Yes gun restriction is necessary because every person isn't capable of using a gun properly.

please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!