If all counties in florida had used the same procedure for recounting votes in the 2000 presidential election, then how might that have affected the outcome of bush v. gore?

the ruling may have changed because the procedure that most of the counties used was unconstitutional

the ruling may have changed because the different procedures for recounting votes between counties violated voters' constitutional rights

the ruling probably would stay the same because the act of recounting was in and of itself unconstitutional

the ruling probably would stay the same because using different procedures for recounting between counties was consistent with the constitution

The correct answer is B) The ruling may have changed because the different procedures for recounting votes between counties violated voters' constitutional rights.

If all counties in Florida had used the same procedure for recounting votes in the 2000 presidential election, then this might have affected the outcome of Bush v. Gore in that The ruling may have changed because the different procedures for recounting votes between counties violated voters' constitutional rights.

In the 2000 Presidential election, Al Gore had more votes than George W. Bush. SO Gore won the popular vote of the US citizens but lost the electoral vote in the Electoral College. In the case of the state of Florida, a mandatory recount of the votes gave the victory to Bush. But the accusations between the two parties continued and the Democrats demanded a hand count of the votes but the Supre Court decided to stop the hand recount in the state. Finally, after 30 some days of the conflict, Al Gore accepted the decision on December 13, 2000.

answer; the edward snowden leaks of nsa classified material;

i am a priest who cares deeply about the church. i have been called here to explain my views on indulgences and other proposed reforms. i would like to explain why my views are consistent with the bible and are correct.