Social Studies
Social Studies, 01.10.2019 19:00, caz27

Frank and gina are looking at an abstract painting in a museum. gina describes objects and people she thinks she sees in the painting. frank says, "it's a bunch of paint thrown on a canvas." gina responds, "no, there is so much here that you just don't see." during lunch they agree that their experience reminds them of what concept they learned in introductory psychology? (1 point)

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:00, deedee2616
What impact does geography have on where people live in brazil?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:50, Ree0628
Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:00, ishrael2001
In the case of furman v. georgia (1972), the united states supreme court ruled that the death penalty- in specific cases- being arbitrarily and inconsistently imposed, often in a discriminatory manner. as a result, the imposition of the death penalty as a punishment was stopped throughout the united states.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:20, issacbeecherpebpyl
Voters commonly condemn politicians for being insincere, but politicians often must disguise their true feelings when they make public statements. if they expressed their honest views—about, say, their party's policies—then achieving politically necessary compromises would be much more difficult. clearly, the very insincerity that people decry shows that our government is functioning well. which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines this reasoning? (a) achieving political compromises is not all that is necessary for the proper functioning of a government. (b) some political compromises are not in the best long-term interest of the government. (c) voters often judge politicians by criteria other than the sincerity with which they express their views. (d) a political party's policies could turn out to be detrimental to the functioning of a government. (e) some of the public statements made by politicians about their party's policies could in fact be sincere.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Frank and gina are looking at an abstract painting in a museum. gina describes objects and people sh...

Questions in other subjects: