Aperson who is not satisfied with an appellate court’s decision

can take the case to another state’s court.
can take the case to a different trial court.
can take the case to a higher court.
can take the case to a federal court.

answer is c

C

Explanation:

got 100% on edge

Can take the case to a higher court.

Explanation:

There has to be a legal foundation for the losing party to be able to appeal. In a civil case, proven that there is a legal foundation, any of the two parties can take the case to a higher court. In a criminal case, no other than the defendant can do it in the majority of states, and the right to do it is limited. Besides, such appeals take place before the beginning of the trial since the U.S Constitution forbids double jeopardy.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; taking detailed notes during the interview;