Slave dred scott sued for his freedom on the basis that his owner had taken him to live in a free state and then a free territory. his case was argued in front of the supreme court in 1857. what was the supreme court's ruling in the dred scott v. sandford case? a. the court ruled that dred scott should not be freed because he had not proven that he had been taken to a free state. b. the court ruled that dred scott should be freed because slavery was unconstitutional. c. the court ruled that dred scott was the property of his owner and that the owner's rights were protected by the constitution, therefore dred scott would not be freed. d. the court ruled that dred scott should be freed because he had been taken to areas in which slavery was illegal.

Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process.

Explanation:

false, if this is a t or f question.

    racial conflict and discrimination has existed ever since man learned to kill with rocks and bones. these conflicts arose from disputes between territory, power, wealth, religion, or simple difference. some of the most infamous racial disputes include slavery, the holocaust, and the civil rights movement.

    these listed disputes often resulted in casualties from all sides. riots, wars, imprisonment, and lynching are all commonly associated with racial conflict on severe levels.

      however, racism is an improving issue in recent decades. people are being more accepting and welcoming of diverse populations. though, the world isn't perfect and it will take much more time, if ever, until the world is rid of racism.