Arebuilt bicycle is worth a certain amount because it takes that much labor to produce it. who did marx believe should be compensated for the bicycle?

a. the laborer who rebuilt the bicycle should receive the value in full..
b. the laborer and the seller should divide the value equally.
c. the seller should receive the value in full.
d. the amount received for the bicycle should go back into the company.

The correct answer is A. The laborer who rebuilt the bicycle should receive the value in full

Explanation:

Karl Marx was a German, economist, theorist and philosopher that lived during the 19th century, mainly recognized for his theories about society and especially about the economy. Indeed, Marx developed a complete theory related to capitalism and the struggle between classes, because Marx considered there was a struggle between the bourgeoise or the people that own the means of production and those that worked, about this Max believed the workers should not sell their labor for wages but receive the value of the object produced. Therefore,  in the case of a rebuilt bicycle that takes much labor to produced Marx would support the idea that the laborer who rebuilt the bicycle should receive the value in full, because he or she is the one with the ability to manufacture products and therefore the seller or owner to the company should not receive any part of the value.

can you explain it better

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.