Social Studies, 22.01.2020 19:31, lauranfamily

The principle of "separation of powers" is improved with a bicameral legislature rather than a unicameral legislature because a bicameral legislature?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:10, Jay23456677888

43. based on what you know about constitutional provisions regarding individual voting rights, which of the following is true? a the constitution places no restriction on the states' power to set voting qualifications. b. the constitution places eight federal restrictions on the states' power to set voting qualifications. c. the federal government cannot restrict the states' power to set voting qualifications except for matters of age and race. d. the constitution places five federal restrictions on the states' power to set voting qualifications.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, lilybrok04

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:30, scheyennekreger

According to the article 13 of the articles of confederation, what percentage of votes by the states was required to ratify any amendments

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 18:00, wrolle

An insurer issued a homeownerâ€™s policy that covered collectible historical documents. the documents, valued at and insured for $70,000, were lost in a fire that destroyed the home. prior to paying the homeowner, the insurer received a demand from a third party that the insurer pay the $70,000 to the third party. the third party contended that the documents had been stolen from the third party. the insurer and third party were citizens of the same state, while the homeowner was a citizen of a different state. the insurer would like to file a federal statutory interpleader action in the federal district court for the state of which the homeowner is a citizen. although this state has a long-arm statute, neither that statute nor the general service of process rules would permit service of process on the third party. the insurer does not wish to deposit the $70,000 with the court or post a bond pending resolution of this matter. of the following, which is a valid reason for advising against the filing of a federal statutory interpleader action in the federal district court? adiversity of citizenship does not exist between the insurer and the third party.

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

The principle of "separation of powers" is improved with a bicameral legislature rather than a unica...