One way the constitution limits individual rights is that it:
a) allows the legislative branch to make laws deemed necessary to maintain stability and security
b) contains a clause stating that all individual rights will be suspended during a national emergency
c) allows the judicial branch to add statements that restrict rights based on court cases
d) contains a clause stating that the president has the sole authority to restrict rights when necessary

Make a chart comparing the requirements for the georgia house to the georgia senate. which one is more stringent? justify your answer in one paragraph.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

What are the unique drivers of behavior that are a result of language and culture?