In a case where a man sues a corporation for unsafe business practices, he will have to meet what burden of proof

   A preponderance of evidence

Explanation:  This type of evidence is used in civil lawsuit where a civilian sues a corporation for injury or the possibility of injury due to unsafe working conditions / practices. In that case, the judgement is in favour of the party who submits a preponderance evidence, which is in fact more convincing than the evidence of the opposite party.  Such a preponderance evidence is evidence based on possible accuracy and probability, not the amount of evidence. The amount of evidence is relevant and has effect in criminal cases.

you probably know the answer. stop asking stupid questions and making me waste my time. j.k. ; )   b.t.w. what are three ratios equivalent to 5 : 11? thx

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.