Ascientist wishes to represent the location of an earthquake in california. which type of model is most appropriate for this purpose?
a. computer simulation
b. equation
c. graph
d. map

A.Computer Simulation

Explanation:

The development of science has helped scientists map natural disasters, such as earthquakes, in order to increase the protective efficiency against such events. Among the tools used, scientists use maps, graphs, computers and radars to lecture on earthquakes. Among these tools, the most appropriate to represent the location of an earthquake is computational simulation. Computers have software that is very advanced and develop models capable of accurately replicating reality.

(A) Computer simulation

Explanation:

 The computer simulation model is one of the computer development application that represent the various type of dynamic response in the system. This computer technique is basically used by the scientist to represent the earthquake location in the California.

 In the computer simulation, when the given program is executed, then the subsequent numerical elements structure a simple of the conduct of the genuine framework, with the outcomes displayed as information. The computer simulation is one of the easy method for analysis the data.

Therefore, Option (A) is correct.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

if you have to make a general question and respond to your thoughts, then this isn't really a question someone can you on. read the passage, form your question, and answer using your thoughts. no one else can understand how you interpreted this text if you don't tell us.