The statement below is from the Magna Carta written in 1215. "To no one will we sell, o no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice." Which political principle justifies this statement? Question 20 options:

The right to trial protects political institutions.

The rule of law guarantees fair legal treatment.

Checks and balances prevent tyranny in government.

Separation of powers permits shared government authority.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Which of the following colonies would most likely have agreed with this stamens the king of england knows what is best for the colonies

Open opinion / / / if a juvenile committed murder, should the juvenile be in prison for life or be free and seek instead? which and why?