How did the conclusion of World War I, and the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, cause further conflict in Southwest Asia? A.
The Austro-Hungarian Empire was divided between the victorious countries with little regard for traditional and cultural boundaries.
B.
The Austro-Hungarian Empire gained control of territories that were previously independent, leading to civil conflict.
C.
The Ottoman Empire was divided between the victorious countries with little regard for traditional and cultural boundaries.
D.
The Ottoman Empire gained control of territories that were previously independent, leading to civil conflict.

yes. it has been proven significantly, especially with a more than ever huge influence of social media & everybody's opinion. for example, we could bring up movements such as the black live's matter movement, or something as such as the march for our lives movement. more than ever it seems as though everybody is starting to care more about this world.

i truly dont know the answer wait i do its 1,3,4

muslims have taken his goods and products to different parts of asia an indonesia. sometimes just traveled and trade, but in other occasions, stayed in the place and made a living.

trade was the key for muslims economies to prosper. their commerce routes reached far places like malaysia and java in the 11th century.

another important factor for prosperity was that muslim states served as the middle point for european traders.

they used to travel by land but sailing the seas -the indian ocean- really increase the exportation of products.