Someone wanna join my pad let.IM BORED Miku Nakano here

Ophelia has written this thesis statement for her informative speech: while both northerners and southerners believed they fought against tyranny and oppression, northerners focused on the oppression of slaves while southerners defended their own right to self-government. which outline for the rest of her speech is probably the most effective? a. 1. industrial causes of war in the north a. [supporting details] b. [specific examples] 2. agricultural causes of war in the south a. [supporting details] b. [specific examples] conclusion: restate thesis b. 1. though causes on both sides were similar, the north’s cause was more just a. [supporting arguments] b. [specific examples] 2. abolishing slavery was worth dying for a. [supporting arguments] b. [specific examples] 3. south had no right to self-government a. [supporting arguments] b. [specific examples] conclusion: restate thesis c. 1. similarities of the causes of war on both sides a. [supporting details] b. [spec

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

The decision states that legislation cannot overcome social prejudice. can it reinforce social prejudice? how?