Christine, a teenager, kept a diary of her most personal moments. The diary was kept hidden in her room. Christine found portions of her private diary, and her picture, posted in a manner accessible to a number of her friends and schoolmates. A friend of the teen's mother was responsible for the postings and was prosecuted for two criminal charges based on acts that violated the teen's privacy. Based upon your reading of Chaney, did Christine have a legitimate expectation of privacy

I think she did have legitimate expactation of privacy because if she is a teen and she keep's a diary  with all her personal moments in there, The friend of the teens mother was responsible for posting things that were in her diary so therefor she would  get two criminal charges

Explanation:

first of all, it's important to say that the book we shall not be moved, written by joan dash, is about the first strike of women in the united states in the year 1909. the best historical detail to clarify the reader's undertanding is the phrase "general strike". this strike involved women working at a garment factory who decided to protest   long working hours, low wages and brutal conditions. this strike became known as "the new york shirtwaist strike" or "the uprising of the 20,000". the strike mostly involved jewish women who did not speak english or who had a basic knowledge of the english language. finally, the strike went on from november 1909 until february 1910.

the density would be a smaller number.