Social Studies
Social Studies, 02.03.2021 22:10, jennsou

Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians' arguments?
A. Neither can be considered a credible source because they did not
experience the American Revolution,
B. Both try to persuade the reader by only including details that
support their arguments.
C. Both try to confuse the reader with unrelated details rather than
making any strong claims,
D. Neither uses any historical evidence to support his claims about
the American Revolution.
PREVIOUS

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:30, td0715
Which two islands are closest to the mainland asia?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:30, bmr12
How does specialization enable countries to trade with one another? a country can make and sell goods affordably and buy goods that it is inefficient at making. a country can make what it chooses and sell its goods to other countries. a country can decide to buy everything it needs from other countries. a country can efficiently make goods that were once difficult to make.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30, dudedude2201
What was the main idea behind the daoist religion? a. everyone's life was guided by moral behavior. b. to live peacefully meant to live a life of suffering. c. family should be put above all else. d. all things should follow the flow of nature.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50, Betzabeth671
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Which statement best describes a similarity between the two historians' arguments?
A. Neither...

Questions in other subjects: