Describe the standard British response to disturbances caused by Gandhi and his followers. Could they have dealt with these situations in any way that might have been more effective? Explain

Which statement is correct ? a. aborigines were the first people to settle australia and new new zealand. b. aborigines were the first people in australia, and maori were the first people in new zealand c. the maori were the first people in australia, and aborigines were the first people in new zealand . d. the aborigines and the maori descended from the polynesians, the first people to settle australia and new zealand.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

President jefferson called a "wall of separation between church and state."