In one to two paragraphs, explain which side (interventionists or isolationists) you think you would have been on and why.

I think I would be on the side of the interventionists because they allow foreign relations and ideas to be put forth.  It allows people to intervene in a situation where there needs to be a system laid down in order to prevent someone from doing a wrong decision and letting a country fall apart.  This is a good system because it allows stronger relations with other countries and governments, while also getting help if you need it in case of an emergency.

    racial conflict and discrimination has existed ever since man learned to kill with rocks and bones. these conflicts arose from disputes between territory, power, wealth, religion, or simple difference. some of the most infamous racial disputes include slavery, the holocaust, and the civil rights movement.

    these listed disputes often resulted in casualties from all sides. riots, wars, imprisonment, and lynching are all commonly associated with racial conflict on severe levels.

      however, racism is an improving issue in recent decades. people are being more accepting and welcoming of diverse populations. though, the world isn't perfect and it will take much more time, if ever, until the world is rid of racism.

when your a dog and you need a bone.   go and eat a rabbit