Social Studies
Social Studies, 16.02.2021 01:00, donbright100

The various inductive argument forms are mutually exclusive. A general statement makes a claim about every object in a set. To draw a conclusion from eyewitness testimony is to make an argument from authority. It is not always possible to determine whether an argument is deductive or inductive. If everyone agrees with a conclusion of an argument, then the argument is deductive. A syllogism must have one premise and two conclusions. Because a witness in a court case must take an oath before offering testimony, this example of argument from authority is deductive. Inductive arguments make use of necessary reasoning. A generalization always involves a sample of members from a larger group. In an inductive argument, the conclusion does not have to follow by strict necessity. Sometimes deductive indicators are inappropriately used by an arguer to make his or her conclusion seem to follow more strongly than it really does. A generalization applies a general principle to a specific instance. The Aristotelian view of induction is that it proceeds from the particular to the general. Pure mathematics is an example of inductive reasoning. A generalization is an inductive argument form.

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:00, machapman6594
What is it called when countries build lots of weapons to store and them in case of a war?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30, arturo200
Should the u. s limit the number of terms a lawmaker serves in the u. s congress 5 paragraph response argumentative
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:10, moncho6222
Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:50, almadimas16
When pay is made public, people evaluate how equitable their pay is in light of the pay other people are receiving. the problem in this case is that dwight and guillermo have found out that others are getting paid more than they do for the same work. what are they likely to do under these circumstances
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
The various inductive argument forms are mutually exclusive. A general statement makes a claim about...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 31.08.2020 14:01
Konu
Spanish, 31.08.2020 14:01