Match each function to the appropriate branch of government​

How does district of columbia v heller relate to federalism

Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist

6–6. business case problem with sample answer— criminal liability. during the morning rush hour, david green threw bottles and plates from a twenty-sixth- floor hotel balcony overlooking seventh avenue in new york city. a video of the incident also showed him doing cart- wheels while holding a beer bottle and sprinting toward the balcony while holding a glass steadily in his hand. when he saw police on the street below and on the roof of the building across the street, he suspended his antics but resumed tossing objects off the balcony after the police left. he later admitted that he could recall what he had done, but claimed to have been intoxicated and said his only purpose was to amuse himself and his friends. did green have the mental state required to establish criminal liability? discuss. [people v. green, 104 a. d.3d 126, 958 n. y.s.2d 138 (1 dept. 2013)] (see criminal liability.)