Question 1 Part A What claim does the author make about binge-watching in the PRO section of the Newsela article "PRO/CON: Binge-Watching"? Binge-watching may lead to weight gain due to inactivity. Binge-watching can help people avoid conflict. Binge-watching may improve relationships. Binge-watching ruins feelings of anticipation for what comes next. Question 2 Part B Which statement accurately assesses the claim identified in Part A? It is ineffective because the physical and mental issues associated with binge-watching outweigh the benefits. It is effective because the author provides several examples of how binge-watching increases social connections, and refers to outside sources. It effective because the author shares first-hand experience of spending more time as a family binge-watching. It is ineffective because when people are binge-watching, they are focused on the content of the shows, not interactions with others.

Explain why the judicial branch is considered the weakest branch. explain what might happen if the judicial branch could not separate itself from the other two branches. explain how a strong judiciary branch would maintain limited government and individual rights. explain why a law that contradicts the constitution must be ruled invalid. explain why the legislature may not determine if its laws are unconstitutional. hamilton argues that the judicial branch is not above the legislative branch. explain his reasoning. how is the problem solved when two laws passed by the same legislature contradict each other? explain why hamilton believes it is pointless to argue the power of judicial review will enable judges to rule in ways that serve their own interests. explain how life tenure is necessary for the judicial branch to be able to protect individual rights against a majority. explain how everyone benefits when the rights of individuals or groups are protected. explain how limited terms of office might discourage the best-qualified people.