Finding 1: An examination of state-level data on electoral turnout reveals that, as states percentages of low-income citizens increase, turnout increases. Conclusion: Low-income citizens are more likely to vote than are high-income citizens. A. For the purposes of this exercise, assume that Finding 1 is correct-that is, assume that Finding 1 describes the data accurately. Is the conclusion supported? Making specific reference to a problem discussed in this chapter, explain your answer
B. Suppose that, using individual-level data, you compared the voting behavior of low-income citizens and high-income citizens. Finding 2: Low-income citizens are less likely to vote than high-income citizens. Explain how Finding 1 and Finding 2 can both be correct.

The defendant is charged with the battery of a bouncer at a local tavern. at the trial, the prosecutor introduces evidence that while the bouncer was attempting to question the defendant about her intoxicated demeanor, the defendant committed a battery on the bouncer. the defendant attempts to defend against the charge on the basis of self-defense, insisting that the bouncer used excessive force in stopping her from entering the tavern. the defendant attempts to introduce into evidence an authenticated copy of the tavern records that show that three patrons had written complaints against the bouncer within the past six months for the use of excessive force. the prosecutor objects on the grounds that the records are inadmissible character evidence. should the court sustain the objection?