A case comes before a Wisconsin state trial court on the subject of free speech on the Internet. It is a case of first impression, meaning that no case involving the same issue has been decided by the Wisconsin courts. In deciding such a case, it would not be considered proper for the judge to consider a. cases from other jurisdictions. b. social values and customs. c. public policy. d. the judge's personal feelings about the Internet.

Read the sentence below, then answer the question that follows. penny learned tolerance after rahj explained the traditions of his family and their practice of indian traditions. the underlined word in the sentence above can best be defined as a. a fair and understanding view of those whose culture, race, or nationality differs from one’s own b. an understanding of a set of organized beliefs and practices that are often centered around one or more deities c. the linking of a group of people based on common characteristics such as culture, beliefs, or common history d. a classification based on inherited physical or biological traits

Which were accomplishments of jane addams? check all that apply. she established hull house. she founded the sierra club. she served on chicago’s board of education. she published a book of photographs showing the urban poor. she won the nobel peace prize in 1931.

Two police officers stopped a car for a minor traffic violation. while one of the officers dealt with the driver and the traffic violation, the other officer talked with the passenger. seeking to question the passenger about gang involvement, but lacking reasonable suspicions of criminal activity, the officer ordered the passenger out of the car. as the passenger exited the car, the officer saw a bulge in the passenger's coat which the officer suspected might be a gun. upon patting down the passenger, the officer felt the handle of a revolver and removed the gun. the passenger, who was a convicted felon, was charged with the possession of a gun by a prohibited possessor. prior to trial, the defendant sought to suppress the gun as evidence, contending that its seizure was unconstitutional. should the court suppress the gun as evidence? ayes, because, since the car had been stopped for a traffic violation, the officer could not order the passenger, who had not committed the violation, to exit the car. byes, because, since the officer lacked reasonable suspicion that the passenger was engaged in criminal activity, the officer could not pat down the passenger. cno, because a valid traffic stop gives an officer the right to pat down a passenger. dno, because the gun was discovered as a consequence of a valid terry stop and frisk.