Eliana has 50 grams of milk and 15 grams of chocolate syrup. She predicts that if she mixes them together, the mixture will weigh 65 grams. How could she collect evidence to prove whether her prediction is correct?

A.
Put the milk in a different cup and measure the weight again.
B.
Mix the milk and the syrup, then see if it tastes good.
C.
Mix the milk and the syrup, then measure the weight.
D.
Put the syrup in a different cup and measure the weight again.

Use statistics below to create a graph titled businesses in the united states, 1997-2003. use information from your graph and from figure 3.1 on page 71 to write a generalization about businesses in america free enterprise system.

Quick using the information in the graph, one might speculate that a) w. w.i created increased job opportunities in the u. s. b) the election of president hoover in 1936 caused unemployment to decline. c) the return of soldiers following w. w.ii caused unemployment to increase in the u. s. d) the new deal programs of president roosevelt created employment opportunities in the u. s.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.