Indiana University students contribute in many ways to what has long been recognized as a rich community of diverse ideas, cultures, and experiences. Identify your most significant contribution to one or more of the communities to which you belong. (Communities, for example, can form around shared experiences in music, sports, the arts, culture, ethnicity, shared beliefs, or ideas.) Describe your level of achievement or involvement and reflect on your most important contributions. Briefly describe how these experiences have influenced you. (200-400 words)

I belonged to a Muslim community in Delhi. The area of Delhi is highly populated and there are very few Muslims in my area. The high density of Hindus has influenced Muslims. The Muslims had no mosque to pray in my area. I was young and had written letters to many officials for the mosque building but there was no response.

Explanation:

I then started gathering the money from the people who lived in my society and I dedicated a room in my house for prayers as a mosque. The Muslims then came to my house and performed religious beliefs. The people were really happy that they have got a place to worship freely. Since many people used to come in the room daily the room was small for such religious offerings. My one of neighbor who was Hindus also asked us to have a room in their house for prayers.  

was the answer correct?

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.