According to Jefferson what was a result of the "tumults in America"? O The American people wanting a new form of national government
European nations having a favorable opinion of the American government
O Foreign governments thinking it was a good time to attack America
O Congress not doing what the American people asked of it

European nations having a favorable opinion of the American government

Explanation:

The tumults in America refers to a period when United States colony experiencing series of civil unrest leading up to the revolutionary war against British empire.

In his letter to to Edward Carrington, Thomas Jefferson mentioned that at at first, he worried that citizens of other European nations will think poorly about United States because of the tumults. But actually, it's the opposite. They see United States effort to establish democracy as an inspiration which eventually led to series of Independence movements toward colonization,

i would say b probably

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )