How did the Supreme Court rule in Worcester v.
Georgia?

The states had no right to impose regulations on Native American territory.

Explanation:

Samuel A. Worcester was part of a white Christian missionary group living in Cherokee territory in Georgia that advised the natives to resist the state´s effort to impose state laws on them. Worcester was arrested, trialed, and sentenced for his actions, but he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that Georgia had no right to impose its laws on Cherokee territory.

The Supreme Court agreed with his claim, holding Georgia laws regarding the Cherokee Nation unconstitutional and therefore invalid.

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.