RE Document #1
DOC #1: Source: William Lloyd Garrison, The Liberator, January 1, 1831
Let all the enemies of the persecuted blacks tremble... I shall strenuously contend for the immediate enfranchisement
of our slave population I am aware that many object to the severity of my language; but is there not cause for
severity? I will be as harsh as truth, and as uncompromising as justice. On this subject, I do not wish to think, or speak,
or write, with moderation. No! No! Tell a man whose house is on fire, to give a moderate alarm; tell him to moderately
rescue his wife from the hand of the ravisher, tell the mother to gradually extricate her babe from the fire into which it
has fallen;-but urge me not to use moderation in a cause like the present. I am in earnest-I will not equivocate-I will
not excuse-I will not retreat a single inch-AND I WILL BE HEARD.
A young country that is expanding and dealing with the issues of sectional divide.
SOURCE:
Historical Context
Audience
Purpose / Point of
View
Region
north
What does it show?
1
How does it create
tension?
Document #2

Tanya was used to using word, and she did some work for her brother mike, who was using wordperfect. tanya was quickly able to use wordperfect for windows with little difficulty, since many of the commands for it were the same as the commands for word. tanya's ability to use wordperfect best illustrates:

The pka of three different c―h bonds is given below. explain the observed trend in pka. select the single best answer.

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.