Hihihihihiihihhihihi i'm bored

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

By the 1820s, many americans wanted to have an equal number of senators from the free states and the slave states. to achieve that, what would need to be true? sorry, the correct answer is: explanation review you answered: questions answered 11 time elapsed 00 17 08 hr min sec challenge stage 2 of 3 get 5 of 6 correct

Which of the following is not critical in decision making? a. taking action independently b. considering internal factors c. considering external factors d. considering decision consequences select the best answer from the choices provided.