Which of the following conclusions can be drawn from the data about the relationship between public opinion and the adoption of public policy?
• Average citizens demonstrate political apathy with regard to changing US public policy.
O Economicaly elite citizens place less value on influencing US public policy than average citizens do.
O Regardless of social class, Americans are generaly apathetic about influencing US public policy.
O The government is more influenced by the economic elites than by average citizens when changing US public policy.
Save and Exit
Submt

The conclusions that can be drawn from the data about the relationship between public opinion and the  adoption of public policy is:

The government is more influenced by the economic elites than by average citizens when changing US public policy.

Explanation:

The economic elites are naturally more outspoken than the average American citizen.  Based on their general exposure, knowledge, and skills, they are also more believable when they express their opinions on public policy than the average US citizen.  This is the reason that they can be influential in cornering public policy towards their opinions.  The average citizen can only act in groups to be heard, unlike the elites, who are already well-known in government circles.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.