Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014) and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010).

The constitutional clause that is common to both McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014) and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) is Freedom of Speech.

In both cases, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that setting limits on campaign contributions is unconstitutional. In McCutcheon v. FEC, the Supreme Court ruled that setting limits on an aggregate contribution by an individual in campaigns is unconstitutional under the First Amendment, which gives a right of freedom of speech.

In Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court ruled that setting limits on the campaign contribution by corporates, non-profit organizations, labor unions, and associations is unconstitutional under the First Amendment, which enables freedom of speech to its citizen.

To know more about the common constitutional clauses between the  McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014) and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), refer to the link below:

link

Freedom of Speech.

Explanation:

The constitutional clause that is common between the McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014) and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) is 'Freedom of Speech.'

In both cases, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that setting limits on campaign contributions is unconstitutional. In McCutecheon v. FEC, the Supreme Court ruled that setting limits on aggregate contribution by an individual in campaigns is unconstitutional under the First Amendment, which gives right of freedom of speech.

In Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court ruled that setting limits on the campaign contribution by corporates, non-profit organizations, labour union, and associations is unconstitutional under the First Amendment, which enables freedom of speech to its citizen.

Therefore, common constitutional clause was 'Freedom of Speech.'

there are indirect ways of affecting state laws   by with holding funding's. and that's why we have a 55mph speed on the high way with a design of 70mph speed.

answer; illegible handwriting;