Do you think DDT should be used in Africa to combat malaria? Why or why not? What do you think the future consequences will be in Africa due to using DDT? Your opinion needs to be backed by reasons. Answers should be at least five sentences long.

No, that's a horrible idea. If we were to use DDT to combat Malaria in Africa, it could bring unparalleled consequences. DDT is known to be harmful to humans and even animals. If we were to use it, we would just be replacing one problem with another and, all of a sudden you'll have people on the ground shaking with seizures. Malaria can be treated, without the usage of DDT that does not leave lasting consequences. DDT as previously mentioned has multiple life-threatening symptoms such as seizures, tremors, vomiting, and shakiness. For the reasons written above, numerous countries have banned its usage including the United States. According to the CDC, "Liver cancer occurred in lab mice that were fed large amounts of DDT. Some studies in humans linked DDT levels in the body with breast cancer, but other studies have not made this link. Other studies in humans have linked exposure to DDT/DDE with having lymphoma, leukemia, and pancreatic cancer." I acknowledge that DDT is effective in combatting insect-borne diseases such as malaria, but this is only when used properly, and I honestly do not have enough faith to hope that there will be no human error. Point being, what is the purpose of eliminating a disease to replace it with another problem.

Explanation:

there we go

how do you know that

explanation:

in brief the senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills.

explanation:

the topics being handled in article 1, section 7, of the u.s constitution, revolve around two issues: the first, the correct procedure to pass legislation regarding revenue production through tax, and the second, the correct process for creating and passing law. in the first case, the text of the constitution literally states that all bills regarding the raising of money, or revenue, need to first be proposed by the house of representatives, although the senate may also play a role here by either proposing such a bill to the house, or agreeing with one being proposed by the house. the second portion, speaks about the process to create, pass and enact legislation. the bill must first be raised by one of the houses, then it must be voted by the plenaries of both houses, and then, it must be presented to the president of the united states, who will either accept it, or veto it, and send it back for reconsideration. if it is not sent back, then the bill is passed into law. if sent back by the president, then the house where the bill originated from will vote again, and if passed by two thirds of the majority, then it goes to the other house, with the observations from the president, for voting. if it passes there as well, then, the bill becomes law, with a few exceptions. this is what is explained in article i, section 7, of the u.s constitution.

hope this have a great