Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, KittyLitty
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00, fluffyskunk302
Which choice best describes the general trend for the countries shown, for the period 2008 - 2010?
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:10, abbygriffin2009
For the united state human rights have been tied to support for
Answers: 1
PLEASE HELP ME and YOU WILL GET BRAINLIEST...
Social Studies, 21.04.2020 20:20
Mathematics, 21.04.2020 20:21
History, 21.04.2020 20:21
History, 21.04.2020 20:21