PLEASE I NEED HEPL Arturo was stopped by a police officer on his way home from school. The police officer wanted to search Arturo's backpack because he heard a teenage boy had just robbed the candy store on the corner. Arturo said to the officer, "Do you have a warrant?" The officer said, “no." Tigran informed the officer that he could not search his bag because it violated his rights."
1 st amendment
6th amendment
4th amendment
10th amendment

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; obscene;