What were the differences in infrastructure between the east and the west in North Carolina in the 1800s? Check all that apply. The west had fewer roads and railroads.
The east had rivers suited for transportation.
The west wanted improvements in infrastructure.
The east had fewer avenues for shipping goods.
The west had more avenues for shipping goods.
The east needed fewer improvements in infrastructure.

What were the differences in infrastructure between the east and the west in North Carolina in the 1800s? Check all that apply.

right The west had fewer roads and railroads.

wrongThe east had rivers suited for transportation.

right The west wanted improvements in infrastructure.

wrong The east had fewer avenues for shipping goods.

wrongThe west had more avenues for shipping goods.

rightThe east needed fewer improvements in infrastructure.

Explanation:

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

the first one is d and the second a