The influence of factions leaders may kindle a flame within their particular States, but will be unable to spread a general conflagration through the other States. A religious sect may degenerate into a political faction in a part of the Confederacy; but the variety of sects dispersed over the entire face of it must secure the national councils against any danger from that source. A rage for paper money, for an abolition of debts, s for an equal division of property, or for any other improper or wicked project, will be less apt to pervade the whole body of the Union than a particular member of it; in the same proportion as such a malady is more likely to taint a particular county or district, than an entire State. Based on this excerpt from the Federalist Papers, No. 10, how did supporters of the Constitution answer those who were concerned that small factions might take over the country?

They described the positive aspects of creating government in three branches with a balance of power.

They stated the benefits of using direct elections to choose the leaders of the country.

They claimed that having many representatives from all parts of the country would dilute the influence of dangerous factions.

They noted that government leaders were not likely to all support the same minority faction.

They listed the possible factions that would undermine the new government's work.

This is multiple choice btw