(Q001) is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.



Judicial activism

Explanation:

Judicial Activism is a situation whereby Judges may interpret the Constitution to their taste, adapting it to modern situations: award rights, make other branches take action, Prescribing rather than proscribe.it is based on the philosophy of judicial decision-making as judges allow, mainly, their personal views about public policy to guide and help in their decisions making or taking. In it, the flexibility of the Constitution is inadequate.

In this philosophy, Court can go beyond the words of the Constitution e.g judge can use his own personal intuition or views or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.

no one should discriminated against because he or she is not from a minority group

answer; ///relational devaluation;