Speaking at Verbatim University's graduation ceremony, Professor Robson compared college and university graduates with adults who are less educated. She correctly noted that people with higher-education degrees pay more taxes, vote more frequently, engage in more volunteer activities in their communities, and are less likely to go to jail than less-educated adults. The professor concluded that colleges and universities obviously do great things for society. How might you reasonably challenge the way the professor reached her conclusion

A way to challenge the way the professor reached her conclusion is by asking her to think why some people did not go to college and how she and many others with higher education degrees can change that.

Explanation:

A way to challenge Professor Robson's conclusion is by mentioning the high costs and the competitive, meritocratic educational system. This is why people without the resources to access higher education lack critical thinking skills and more information to do better. As graduates, it would be beneficial to help others enter university or educate them so that all citizens have equal opportunities. The comparison only creates a gap between educated and less educated people.

Besides, the university is not the only way to be more educated. Some people achieve high levels of education from experience, reading, or talking to people.

answer; face validity;

answer; you are making a normative argument and i am making a positive argument;